Competitive is a claim. This makes it a number.
Growth runs through introducing brokers, and an IB places business on price. When they weigh you against another broker they are comparing numbers you cannot see. This is that comparison, measured the same way for both, re-run every day.
The comparison happens whether you are in it or not.
An introducing broker weighing two books is looking at cost to trade and cost to hold. If a competitor tightened a flagship pair last week, the IB knows before you do, because their clients feel it first.
- Like-for-like instruments, measured the same way
- All-in cost: spread plus swap plus commission
- Real broker names, not an anonymous band
- Session-level, so you see when you slip
Four numbers your team can take to an IB.
- Spread, raw and all-in, in dollars per million
- Swaps on both legs against the peer median
- Commissions mapped tier to tier, like for like
- Your rank on every pair, day by day
When a peer moves on price you get an alert the day it happens: which symbol, which broker, by how much. Daily, weekly and monthly reports reach the desk without anyone logging in.
Two halves of the same question.
A finding inside your own servers tells you something changed. Peer context tells you whether it matters. A spread that widened by half a pip is a number until you know whether the rest of the market held.
Competitive is a claim. This makes it a number.
Growth runs through introducing brokers, and an IB places business on price. When they weigh you against another broker they are comparing numbers you cannot see. This is that comparison, measured the same way for both, re-run every day.
The comparison happens whether you are in it or not.
An introducing broker weighing two books is looking at cost to trade and cost to hold. Not at your marketing. If a competitor tightened a flagship pair last week, the IB knows before you do, because their clients feel it first.
We measure the same instruments across your peer set and put your numbers beside named brokers. Not to crown anyone. To tell you where a client shopping around would place you, on the symbols that actually carry your flow.
- Like-for-like instruments, measured the same way
- All-in cost: spread plus swap plus commission
- Real broker names, not an anonymous band
- Session-level, so you see when you slip, not just whether
Four numbers your sales team can take to an IB.
Spread and swap benchmarking is the surface. Behind it sits true cost to trade, account tier mapping and live ranking, so your team sees not just where you lead but exactly which broker an IB is weighing you against, down to the number.
Spread, raw and all-in
Every symbol's quoted spread plus any commission, normalised to dollars per million. That is what makes a raw account and a standard account genuinely comparable instead of a marketing argument.
Swaps, long and short carry
Overnight financing on both legs, per symbol, against the peer median. It is the cost an introducing broker feels most, because their clients are the ones holding the position.
Commissions and account tiers
How your standard tier prices against the equivalent tier elsewhere, mapped tier to tier. A like-for-like number survives contact with someone who checks. A headline rate does not.
Position rank over time
Your rank on every pair, day by day. Who tightened, who slipped, where you moved. Momentum rather than a snapshot, so a competitor's move is a trend you saw coming.
The day it happens, not the quarter after.
When a peer lists a new product, changes what it costs a client to hold, or moves on price, it arrives as an alert: which symbol, which broker, by how much. Daily, weekly and monthly reports go to the desk as well, so your team carries the current picture into an IB conversation without logging in to anything.
Priced against you, daily
Live conditions re-pulled and re-ranked against your peer set every day, through whichever channel your team already works in.
Your peer set, your choice
The competitor list is yours to set and change. Most brokers start with the twenty they actually lose deals to, then widen.
Read-only, always
Nothing here requires a change to your pricing, your platform or your feed. We measure what is publicly quoted, the same as any client would see.
Two halves of the same question.
A finding inside your own servers tells you something changed. Peer context tells you whether it matters.
A spread that widened by half a pip is just a number until you know whether the rest of the market held. A swap that looks expensive is only expensive next to the alternative your client is being offered. One without the other is half an answer.
That is why these run together rather than as separate products, and why the same measurement lands in a compliance finding and in a sales conversation on the same day.
- The same instrument, measured the same way, across every book
- Your own configuration on one side, the market on the other
- One number, in dollars, that both a desk and a regulator recognise